Head to head

Cecotec Conga Y60 Pearl or Ultenic MX50: which should you choose?

Compare the two robot vacuum cleaners across our catalogue's scoring criteria, value by value. Scores are relative to all the models we've analysed.

Cecotec Conga Y60 Pearl, studio product shot

Cecotec Conga Y60 Pearl

8.5/10
Overall score

Main drawbackMopping is supplementary, with no established scrubbing system

Check price on Amazon → Read the full analysis →
Ultenic MX50, studio product shot

Ultenic MX50

8.3/10
Overall score

Main drawbackModest onboard dust capacity is the main reservation for shedding pets

Check price on Amazon → Read the full analysis →

Our verdict based on your priority

  • Priority “Dustbin capacity”Cecotec Conga Y60 Pearl 7.9 / 10 vs 7.4
  • Priority “Battery life”Cecotec Conga Y60 Pearl 9.2 / 10 vs 8.6

Feature by feature

Feature-by-feature comparison of Cecotec Conga Y60 Pearl and Ultenic MX50
Criterion Cecotec Conga Y60 Pearl Ultenic MX50
Max coverage 8.8 8.8
Dustbin capacity 7.9 advantage 7.4
Battery life 9.2 advantage 8.6
Equipment 8.1 8.5

A gap of less than half a point is not counted as an advantage: our scores are relative to the catalogue, and using them to pick a winner would imply a level of precision we cannot claim.

Side-by-side specs

Specifications for Cecotec Conga Y60 Pearl and Ultenic MX50
SpecificationCecotec Conga Y60 PearlUltenic MX50
Max coverage200 m²200 m²
Dustbin capacity350 mL300 mL
Battery life200 min180 min
Suction powerNot providednot disclosed (unverified)
FeaturesAuto-empty stationAuto-empty station
NavigationLiDARLiDAR
Recharge and resumeyesyes

Values taken from the specifications table in each analysis; “Not provided”: no value found. “unverified”: among the 5 key specifications (Max coverage, Dustbin capacity, Charging time, Battery life, Suction power), a value found online that no verified source (archived retailer page or manufacturer documentation) confirms. Other rows are not subject to this check.

Which one is right for you?

Cecotec Conga Y60 Pearl

Leads on 2 criteria of 4 compared

  • Battery life: 9.2/10 vs 8.6/10 (200 min vs 180 min)
  • Dustbin capacity: 7.9/10 vs 7.4/10 (350 mL vs 300 mL)
View Cecotec Conga Y60 Pearl →

Ultenic MX50

Leads on 0 criterion of 4 compared

  • No numerical specification sets it apart in this comparison.
View Ultenic MX50 →

As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Comparison based on published specifications and our scores, calculated using the same criteria for every model. Our approach →

Frequently asked questions

Which scores higher, Cecotec Conga Y60 Pearl or Ultenic MX50?

They're neck and neck: 8.5/10 for Cecotec Conga Y60 Pearl, 8.3/10 for Ultenic MX50. A gap of less than half a point is not considered an advantage.

Which comes out ahead on “Battery life”?

Cecotec Conga Y60 Pearl comes out ahead on “Battery life”: 9.2/10 compared with 8.6/10 for Ultenic MX50. Recorded figures: 200 min compared with 180 min.

Which comes out ahead on “Dustbin capacity”?

Cecotec Conga Y60 Pearl comes out ahead on “Dustbin capacity”: 7.9/10 compared with 7.4/10 for Ultenic MX50. Recorded figures: 350 mL compared with 300 mL.

More useful comparisons

Spotted an error on this page? Report it